Christopher Brooks
P.O. Box 144
Nathalia, 3638
Tel /Fax 58662788
Member for Murray
Dr Sharman Stone
426 Wyndham St
Shepparton,
Fax 58218429
13th June 2002
Dear Dr Sharman Stone ,
What a tedious pedantic denial you weave Dr Sharman Stone as you avoid my questions:
# Why is Australia participating in the Afghanistan conflict?
# What is the justification for the anti terror legislation?
# Who are the evil terrorists we are fighting in the “war against
terror?”
My “main aim” Dr Stone is not “to pass on material” , it is to uphold my
responsibility to make you accountable for your role in a fraudulent “war against
terror” and the fraudulent imposition of anti-terrorist legislation.
You represent the public of the Murray Electorate and are morally bound to serve with honesty
and integrity.
Forgive me for being old fashioned in expecting you to genuinely discover, act upon and speak
the truth.
I wish to place before YOU, and discuss, evidence which proves that the official version of events
presented by the U.S. agencies and acceded to by the Australian Government, on many
occasions, is a matrix of lies and disinformation. I expect you to provide justification for the
actions of the Australian Military in Afghanistan and the passage of anti-terrorist legislation. This
is not an unreasonable request?
In your response you state, “Neither I, nor the Australian Government has blamed “Arabs” for
the recent international terrorist events.” This is indeed a cryptic comment considering the
statements on the public record.
For clarities sake pray tell me precisely who the responsible parties for the destruction of the
WTC buildings and
Pentagon attacks are and what evidence you can provide to support this charge.
Since when did Australia suspend the requirement of a judicial trial before the presumption of
innocence was abandoned?
Please take seriously your responsibility to defend the letter and spirit of our Constitution.
The following extract is taken from a speech by Robert Mueller, Director, FBI, delivered on the
19th April, 2002 at the Commonwealth Club of California.
The plans were hatched and financed overseas, beginning as long as five years ago. Each of the
hijackers came from abroad: fifteen from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates, and
one each from Lebanon and Egypt. All 19 entered our country legally, and only three had
overstayed the legal limits of their visas on the day of the attacks.
While here, the hijackers did all they could to stay below our radar. They contacted no known
terrorist sympathizers. They committed no egregious crimes. They dressed and acted like
Americans, shopping and eating at places like Wal-Mart and Pizza Hut, blending into the
woodwork all the while. When four got speeding tickets in the days leading up to September
11th, they remained calm and aroused no suspicion. Since none were known terrorists, law
enforcement had no reason to question or detain them.
The hijackers also left no paper trail. In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece
of paper – either here in the U.S. or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in
Afghanistan and elsewhere – that mentioned any aspect of the September 11th plot. The
hijackers had no computers, no laptops, no storage media of any kind. They used hundreds of
different pay phones and cell phones, often with prepaid calling cards that are extremely difficult
to trace. And they made sure that all the money sent to them to fund their attacks was wired in
small amounts to avoid detection.
In short, the terrorists had managed to exploit loopholes and vulnerabilities in our systems, to
stay out of sight, and to not let anyone know what they were up to beyond a very closed circle.
This is the “Arab” conspiracy theory that I challenged you to prove with some evidence. You
appear to suggest that the FBI have got it wrong in claiming that the Australian Government has
never blamed “Arabs” for the recent terrorist events. This is one point we could agree on given
Mueller’s statement is a mish-mash of baseless suggestion and fantasy, including contradictions
with other statements made by the FBI. Unfortunately, I suspect your answer was not intended to
convey such belief , only to avoid the very credible and legitimate challenge I have made to
produce proof.
Unless you agree we have already surrendered to the tyranny of dictatorship and the
cancellation of legal process and constituted judicial examination of accused in our society then
you must concur that the actions of the Australian Government are nothing less than a scandal.
The fact that I may well be the only constituent to expect justification for your action is of no
consideration to the question of what is morally right and wrong.
In terms of complicity you stand on quick sand, though invisible to the broad public and escaping
any examination. What would be the judgement of the community if the full light of truth was to
shine on the “ 911” events removing the shadows to expose the cowardly and lazy self serving
silence of the men and woman charged with the responsibility to uphold and defend our National
integrity and honour?
It is indisputable that the evidence to support the above official version of events, not only has
not been examined but has never been presented in any acceptable or serious format.
I would appreciate an answer to the three questions posed above?
I am patient and would be happy to meet with you in July. My research is a work in progress and
the evidence is only gaining greater clarity and depth with the progress of time. The moral
dilemma is only magnified by the feeble silence of those who should speak.
Sincerely,
Christopher Brooks
|
