BrooksUncensoredStoneIraqMay2002911Questions

Christopher Brooks
P.O. Box 144
Nathalia, 3638
Tel /Fax 58662788

Member for Murray
Dr Sharman Stone
426 Wyndham St
Shepparton,
Fax 58218429
29th May 2002

Dear Dr Sharman Stone ,

I wish to make an appointment for an interview to discuss and furnish you with hundreds of
pages of evidence that raise many disturbing questions surrounding the events of September
11th 2001, proving without doubt that the “war against terror” is a fraud. All questions can only
be answered by an open public investigation to establish exactly what happened on Sept 11
2002 and who was responsible? It is now clear that the U.S. inquiry has been sidelined down
the FBI incompetence road and no doubt appropriate “patsy” heads will roll. This pantomime will
satisfy the public who have been shielded from the real evidence and will serve the purpose of
entrenching the mythology of the “Muslim” attack without actually providing any evidence of
substance to prove this conclusion. The case to support the official story will never be
examined. In fact great efforts are being directed towards disinformation and confusion to
ensure that any sceptical mind , but for the very dogged, are exhausted in their attempt to
understand and discover the truth.
This in turn makes the proposed anti-terrorist legislation completely illegitimate.
I do not hesitate for one second in my claim that the evidence is damning and the predicament is
serious and dangerous. This travesty of truth against humanity will define the near future of
mankind. Mere words cannot describe my feelings of betrayal and disappointment at the sheer
depth of corruption and incompetence, not just in the political sphere, but throughout most of the
media where there appears to be no critical faculties remaining.
I will be seeking an explanation for Australia’s participation in the Afghanistan conflict in light of
this information. I will be seeking your evidence to justify the action of the Australian Government.

Some of the evidence I will tender to you deals with:

# Bin Laden video evidence, frauds and denials;
# fraudulent evidence regarding “Muslim” terrorist official story. bags found at airport with
suicide notes, floating passports from WTC inferno;
# FBI released alleged terrorist list of names ;   seven men accounted for elsewhere, claim of
false ID not credible with airport security procedures and puzzling elements to released
passenger lists, analysis documents;
# no explanation of how authorities rapidly discovered suspect list of names or the airport car
park evidence
# FBI statements that no evidence has been uncovered to implicate Bin Laden;
# standard intercept protocols totally absent and gaping contradictions in released statements
explaining why attack was not challenged;
# suppressed information about Israeli espionage connected to the WTC/Pentagon attacks and
evidence of   foreknowledge of Israeli government;
# Afghanistan attack planned prior to Sept 11, Caspian Oil reserves and Pipeline.
# official photographic and statement evidence indicating Pentagon official story is simply not
credible, contradictions in eyewitness statements and absurdities; claim that aeroplane
“atomised” on impact
# research papers on the oddities of the collapsing buildings including building seven which
was not struck by an airplane;
# insider trading before September 11 attacks;
# the Lavon Affair and other Israeli manufactured frame ups;
# the Anthrax terror evidence and “Arab” frame up;
# timeline of Bush on Sept 11 and extraordinary claims of viewing first WTC attack on TV;
# timeline of Sept 11events analysing the glaring inconsistencies of the official version of events
which clearly prove negligence of extreme proportions or treason;
# the obscure and possibly cryptic Vreeland {U.S. Navy intelligence}prior knowledge case;
# Bin Laden`s CIA background and recent contacts;
# many questions that must be answered to explain contradictions of official statements and
media propaganda.

Yours Sincerely,
Christopher Brooks