Christopher

www.brooksuncensored.com

Brooksuncensored

    to  The Shepparton News
 
     Greetings Liselotte,       From      Christopher Brooks   58662788,    ccbrooks@bigpond.com
         
  I believe you are canvassing for questions to submit to the candidates for the Murray Electorate.

      It just so happens I have a few unanswered questions that have been falling on deaf
      ears in the media and Sharman's office.
                     
     The 9/11 "Muslim conspiracy theory"  that is now the official political/historical backdrop of
           our post 9/11 era has been employed as a pretext to justify a war policy that would have
          been impossible to achieve previously. My research indicates that the public have been
           deceived by an Orwellian hoax that many in our community suspect but are too fearful to
            confront.
        Sharman Stone has failed to accept my challenge to provide evidence to support her
                        "Muslim conspiracy theory".   www.brooksuncensored.com

 

Questions :1. Do you believe there is legally credible evidence to support the official
                 "Muslim conspiracy theory" claiming Bin Laden and 19 Muslim fanatics
             were responsible for September 11 2001, and if so, what evidence of integrity
                    can you specifically reference to support your view.
                         
      2.          What is the explanation for the countless absurdities and contradictions
                  dished up by political spin doctors and the corporate media?  
                           Examples noted below                              

      3.           Why is the media and the public frightened to investigate properly the real
                   nature of the "War on Terror"?
    
4.  How many innocent victims have been killed in Afghanistan and Iraq since 9/11/2001?

               Notes
   Secrecy is the defence of those whose actions cannot bear the scrutiny of open enquiry.

                   a,   The responsible secret service detail would have removed Bush from Booker elementary
                    because if the surprise attack was genuine he would have been immediately considered
                    a possible target.  Bush remained in a reading program press event for 7 minutes
                   following Andy Card  whispering in his ear {allegedly confirming a terrorist attack though
                   Bush asked no questions or gave no instruction}  and remained at the school to give a
                   press conference for approx 40 minutes.  Clearly those who made decisions on Bush's
                  activities  must have known he was not in any danger as the record reveals that there
                  were multiple planes still in the air that were allegedly potential threats.  

            b,   Cell phone conversations are key to the claims made about the "hijacking" events but
                   cell phones will not function above 7-8000 feet.  What does this mean?

            c,     The official claim is that US air defence was not prepared for hijacked planes employed
                   as missiles, but on September 11 2001 multiple war game drills were in process
                    of  simulating hijackings and planes crashing into buildings that have never
                     been seriously revealed or accounted for by the media or our Parliament.  
                    These drills created the confusion and cover for the real events ensuring standard air
                    safety intercept protocols were "unplugged" and did not function.

            d,   No steel frame skyscraper building has ever collapsed from fire yet many previous fires have raged
                   for much longer periods than this event. Tape records of fire personnel in the buildings at crash levels
                   indicate the fires were manageable and certainly nothing like an inferno.  As the spectacular
                   TV footage reveals the fuel mostly exploded in the air outside the building in the second
                     collision yet that building collapsed first.    Does this make sense?
                    Both buildings collapsed symmetrically into their footprint very similar to planned demolitions.
                    WTC building 7 [40 odd stories]  was not hit by any planes but collapsed late in the
                   afternoon of 9/11 and a lengthy investigation by FEMA could not determine the cause of it's
                  collapse {also symmetrical into it's footprint} until the owner of the WTC lease, Silverstien, recently
                  revealed on live television that the building was "pulled" which is shorthand for demolished by
                   controlled implosion following consultation with the fire fighting authorities. FEMA investigated
                     for a year ignorant of this claim.  This is bewildering to say the least?

             e,    The debris from the WTC site was removed without proper investigation and shipped off shore.

              f,    Suspiciously large "put option" transactions made just prior to 9/11  anticipated the sudden
                    collapse of airline and related stock  delivering handsome profits to inside track parties but
                     the initial Bin Laden profit suggestions evaporated when no connection could be established.
                     Secrecy still surrounds this investigation.

             g,   The aircraft at Pennsylvania [alleged flight 93} was spread over a six mile wreckage field which is
                   incompatible with the claim that the plane was flown into the ground by hijackers.
                    The official account is impossible.   Was this aircraft shot down or is there other explanations?

             h,    The communications and black box recorders have been shrouded in secrecy including changing
                     versions  of the "official" story and time line statements that have never been examined in any
                      transparent or constituted fashion.

              i,   The initial sensational "evidence" discovered in cars at airports and bags in terminals that amazingly           
                 missed   the flights contained a hotch potch of apparent proof of a "Muslim" conspiracy were revealed
                  to be ridiculous and full of absurdities and perplexities when examined on balance.
                     This evidence is clearly contrived to blame "Muslims" but was so flawed it could never be
                        accepted as genuine.  Who could have planted this material and why?

               j,    The invasion of Afghanistan was already scheduled before 9/11/2001  to achieve oil and gas pipeline
                       projects and other agendas.  Statements by Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Republican sponsored   
                      Project for a New American Century  have stressed that America needed a shock comparable to
                          Pearl Harbour  to accomplish its aggressive geopolitical aims.

             k,     Bush has twice claimed to have viewed live the 1st impact at the WTC but this is seemingly not
                             possible  because the Naudet  "Firehouse" video was not live to TV and was not screened until
                               many hours after the event.   Just another bewildering aspect to the 9/11 riddle as yet
                             unexplained to the public.

             l,       The names of the hijackers were released almost immediately to the public yet the published flight
                      passenger   lists did  not include these  names and 8 of the 19 are still alive.  It is claimed that the
                        identities were stolen but in a "Bin Laden" statement alluding to supposed training in Afghanistan
                        for the "attack", Hollywood  "Bin Laden" talks about identities that are still alive [identity theft] as
                                participating in preparations  for the 9/11 operation.    Think about that for a while!   
                     Who would be manufacturing the fraudulent video  and tape propaganda material?  
                    Why is this not intelligently examined?

               m,     In an uncontested genuine interview with Pakistan paper "Ummat", Sept 28 2001,  Bin Laden
                    said he had  nothing to do with 9/11 suggesting that parties in the  US were most likely responsible
                   for deliberately  blaming Muslims to accelerate foreign policy objectives.   Various video and tape
                        exhibits since 9/11 make a cocktail of claims which appear to support the  "Muslim conspiracy theory"
                     but all of the "evidence" has under examination been exposed as fraudulent  or doubtful
                   misinformation presented by "actors" in a staged deadly drama.

              n,      The official version of the Pentagon incident is unbelievable when the physical evidence is measured
                        against the Flight 77 Pentagon plot claims.  The aircraft approached in a deliberate intricate
                                 sweeping   dive striking the Pentagon in the largely uninhabited  and newly strengthened sector
                          of the building. The damage pattern and debris at the crash site are perplexing and buried in
                         secrecy and impossibilities.

              o.      In the preceding weeks and months before 9/11 the U.S. Allegedly  received "warnings" from all over
                         the world that an event like this was about to happen , but FBI investigations into suspected terrorists
                         were by all appearances suppressed and those warnings were deliberately disregarded. Was this
                          incompetence, negligence or orchestrated blindness.

                                     

    Why are candidates frightened to investigate properly and witness to the truth?