SEARCHING THROUGH THE PROPAGANDA FOG FOR TRUTH IN OUR TIME |
Christopher
"War On Terror" |
Brooksuncensored
A Dynamic Knowledge Compendium |
P.O. Box 144, NATHALIA, 3638. |
Al Qaeda : Made in USA No. Terror 1 |
ccbrooks@bigpond.com |
Al Qaeda does not exist and never has
by Joseph John Hrevnack
08/19/2004 13:31
The basic truth is that Al Qaeda does not exist and never has. Al Qaeda is a manufactured enemy
who was created by the Bush Administration in order to have an excuse to wage a war for the
control of the world"s oil resources.
Did an American even hear the words "Al Qaeda" before 9-11? Or were we told that its alleged
leader Osama Bin Laden has family who themselves have personal business relationships with
George W. Bush"s family and that both families had financially profited considerably from the "War
on Terror"?
If "Al Qaeda" was such an organized group terrorists as we are being told then why were not we the
people notified of this evil threat when the US Cole was bombed a few months before 9-11? "Al
Qaeda" is nothing more than a broad euphemistic umbrella classification used to group any Middle
Eastern fighter under the Sun as an enemy. The most diabolical aspect of this public relations stunt
is that it enables the current Administration to label any group it feels necessary to attack to appear
to be related to an unprovable organized enemy while at the same time actually increasing its
approval ratings by exploiting the basic primal fears of the American public. Furthermore when one
realizes the questionable motivations that this Administration has used previously to attack an
enemy, as what is now surfacing about the Iraq War, one begins to get the strange feeling that this
Orwellian double-speak is nothing more than a smoke and mirror illusion whose true intentions
would of made Goebbels himself jealous.
Think about it: How could a bunch of technologically backward people from third-world nations
such as "Al Qaeda" ever have any real central organization structure? If they had any real
organization they would have most certainly attacked us again after September eleventh. Where
are all the terrorist cells in this country? Contrary to what has been implicitly presented in the media
there HAS NEVER been a single domestic terror cell caught since Bush has been in office! The
majority of suspects that have been arrested and detained in the immediate aftermath of 9-11 with
the exception of a handful have not been charged with crimes in anyway associated with terrorism.
All of their crimes are minor and for the most part are related to immigration violations of some
sort. There is some ambiguity in all of this though because to this day the Ashcroft Justice
Department has been less than forthcoming with the specifics of these arrests. Why would this be
the case if the justifications for these arrests were really legitimate? We have been bombarded by
the media with every indignity from the duck-tape chronicles to the crop dusting threat. You would
think that with all this seeming sensitivity by our government about informing the general populace
about possible terror threats, especially when some of their sources came from "unnamed and
confidential secondary sources", that the Ashcroft Justice Department would have gone out of it"s
way to mention to the public any terrorist connections that the people detained after 9-11 had and
would of sworn by it on a stack of Bibles.
To date the only really suspicious activity of people detained after 9-11 were a group of Israelis
who were caught in Jersey City, New Jersey filming themselves in the foreground of the burning
World Trade Center with "looks of jubilation on their faces". It was later confirmed that two of the
gentlemen detained had known Mossad ties. While they were detained it is of no matter now as
they were subsequently released from jail a few weeks later and were allowed to go back to Israel
with no questions asked by the direct authorization of the Justice Department. I guess they were
just dropping off a box of cigars to Governor McGreevy?
What is even more illuminating about all of this is that to this day nobody has taken responsibility
for the attacks of 9-11, including "Al Qaeda". The only thing to link these attacks to anyone is the
video tape of Osama Bin Laden that was conveniently found in a cave in Afghanistan that had him
talking about the physical structure of the World Trade Center and the plane strike. The audio
quality of this tape is so poor that any objective Arab-speaking analyst who was asked to give their
opinion was unable to do so! as they claimed that just about all the words on it were inaudible. I
believe an objective investigation into this original tape"s authenticity could verify if this admission
is in fact genuine and could shed some light on the truth of the existence of "Al Qaeda". But even if
this tape is genuine what would this really prove? As I have already mentioned it is common
knowledge that Osama Bin Laden is connected to George W. Bush"s family by a minimum of two
degrees of separation. So in the grand scheme of things what does this really matter? That the
Cobra Commander said he did it?
In summary, "Al Qaeda" does not exist nor has it ever. If it really existed to anywhere near the
extent that we have been told then there would have been an attack on our homeland. Of course
this proof of a negative is used by the Administration to justify themselves to the American public
that they are doing their jobs, but when one realizes that "Al Qaeda" is really nothing more than an
artificially manufactured enemy then what job are they really doing other than capitalizing off of
people"s fears? What other issue does the present Administration have to offer the average
working-class citizen other than security? And if security is really only a Red Herring platform issue,
then of what use are they to begin with? In addition, ! if there were any degree of truth in the
strength of "Al Qaeda" or even of their very existence then there would have been a much larger
resistance in Afghanistan and especially in Iraq. If an organization structure existed within "Al
Qaeda" then you would have seen the Iraqi resistance be a much more conventional ! one. They
would have had the communication capability and weapons arsenal to mount a more traditional
counter-offensive against our troops and they would have been successful doing it because our
force"s numbers are so minimal. This would have been a prime opportunity to defeat "the great
Satan" in front of the entire world. Their motivation to do so would have been so strong that in
order for them to of not of done this one must make the quantum leap and conclude that "Al
Qaeda" is much to do about nothing and always has been. The emperor is naked and running
through the courtyard with a great big barrel of oil.
Joseph John Hrevnack